Re: Dispatcher failover to the next least loaded destination

Hello,

I haven't looked to the code, but I think it will just take the next entry from the XAVP. Maybe you can test it and report back.

Cheers,

Henning

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ivan Ribakov via sr-users <[email protected]>
> Sent: Freitag, 25. Juli 2025 17:05
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: [SR-Users] Dispatcher failover to the next least loaded destination
> 
> Hi all, I'm wondering if it is currently supported to perform failover while
> respecting the call load distribution algorithm.
> 
> What makes me doubt this is possible is the following wording in the
> documentation:
> 
> > The rest of the destination list is taken in order of the entries in set - anyhow,
> until a re-route to next destination happens, the load on each address can
> change.
> 
> >From it it's not clear if ds_next_dst() will simplify use next entry from the AVP
> list or if it will attempt to intelligently choose next entry from the AVP list
> taking into the account updated call load of the remaining entries.
> __________________________________________________________
> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions -- sr-
> [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-
> [email protected]
> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the
> sender!
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!