Re: How to correctly generate a 181 Call is being forwarded reply?

Hi again

> I don't seem to get it working as expected - still trying to figure out
> what and where the call fails.

I think I have found what goes wrong.

A => B => CFW => C

C has MIN-SE: 900
A is initially sending Sestion-Timer: 600

Without 181 reply:

C replies with 422 Timer too Small Min-SE: 900
This 422 Reply has a ToTag.

A re-initiates the call with a larger session timer, that INVITE has NO
ToTag - new transaction. The Calls succeeds.

Now I repeat the same, but I send a 181 message back to A BEFORE A
receives the 422 from C. That 181 has a ToTag.

Now when A re-initiates the INVITE, it includes the ToTag received in
the 181 and loose_route fails as there is no such transaction.

Is A misbehaving by including a ToTag when it should not? Should the 181
reply not contain a ToTag?

I again tried all variants

* sl_send_reply() generates ToTag
* send_reply() generates ToTag
* t_reply() does not send the reply.

Mit freundlichen Grüssen

-Benoît Panizzon-
-- 
I m p r o W a r e   A G    -    Leiter Commerce Kunden
______________________________________________________

Zurlindenstrasse 29             Tel  +41 61 826 93 00
CH-4133 Pratteln                Fax  +41 61 826 93 01
Schweiz                         Web  http://www.imp.ch
______________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!