Re: High volume ratelimit CPS
"Jon Bonilla (Manwe) via sr-users" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.voip.ser |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
El Mon, 8 Dec 2025 19:49:58 +0000 Ben Kaufman <[email protected]> escribió: > I don't see how it could fail to be "fast enough", since $shtinc() is atomic. > In other words if you were running 600 children (theoretically, please don't > actually set children to 600), the operation $var(cps) = > $shtinc(caps=>$var(cps)) will only happen one at a time, all other processes > will wait until it is free before they can change it. > Hi Ben I really don't know. I remember adding a log because the destination was complaining and the cps being sent was higher than the limit before the rejections hit. I need to set a new box for another destination. I'll try to implement the same solution and reproduce it. __________________________________________________________ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEeCM0ZbH8r7OFHtBdv/8mNWfCIT8FAmk3RWgACgkQv/8mNWfC IT+QgRAAxAoajAD6erbkxaXlRX3hHLYJnHcWK3TzLSsgs1MQqKYN7SaKVHlX4s1z tHebLuigmCDyw7WT6UfQ93WoELkivl9FEoZuFgFs58grB5VhPvyAk0qVjFZhoReA mky9Z9uPKP1COU9xr7VPhFSJAnRjVlOf5nlnlsKk7eYhNbaVInnGB5n0BjjfA0HF nYCu47X+sVxWWSgupK57Ng8HE5fqbtCOMiu9lRBnllh/TJBhdnAyQp8arJJs+HtB QJrHSIZqo9gsI88sgM4iDAZrJXf44ZWg8XklVv6jzgCTG5qKOSDPecR61Dw0H8RC 5JF3DMuj5WMlOu+//QX1nLUegLnU7dM93N4Wt8K3JeKIGuFe7aoOSq/jAkuwQ7Jv pFf2XD/MWcCvezz77ZZ1o1k1n/iZJ5Al5tPlzZHAGHRwnQtqScha/yq8u0Zvyr5G 2rafiraiVg15NjoW/IgGikUI9yC26AVYP0fol+pmojQeQEkBAcsAUmNp4XYI+0d/ tOer7sF21/OnFeGUvZG3yGAye4sVnNSC7l5wWfzjqIRMtyPXMBCmOKU1LMoUVpEJ x4PxHSiq9WhX4B11km4oKV4tSwwSbdtj20RuRaXEkdmX9DqJBH/as3j0woYpAchJ uuJRpQgQSYhalwOSOctFD3WjNyACe2doTxTwntX8cG489VO2+rw= =UaOO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----