Re: High volume ratelimit CPS

Henning Westerholt via sr-users <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.voip.ser
Message-ID <AM8PR07MB8108084BDF5A9501B7966A2CBFAAA@AM8PR07MB8108.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Hello Jon,

yes, both modules they track concurrent calls. For an approximation you could use Little's Law [1], but it will be of course not accurate.

If you need to track call attempts accurately for contractual reasons, then you probably need to use another way.

Cheers,

Henning


[1] concurrent calls  = calls per second  × (ASR/100) × ACD

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Bonilla (Manwe) <[email protected]>
> Sent: Montag, 15. Dezember 2025 22:42
> To: Henning Westerholt <[email protected]>
> Cc: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Re: High volume ratelimit CPS
> 
> El Mon, 15 Dec 2025 21:18:51 +0000
> Henning Westerholt <[email protected]> escribió:
> 
> > Hello Jon,
> >
> > you probably investigated and decided against it, but there are other, more
> > easy ways of tracking call volume (concurrent calls) over destinations. There
> > is the dialog module with the named profile support, and also the dlgs
> module
> > offering a more lightweight approach. These two would be my approach to
> > implement something like this.
> >
> 
> Hi Henning
> 
> I'm not tracking concurrent calls but call attempts per second. I don't think
> dlg module and named profiles match this scenario, do they?
> 
> 
> 
> cheers,
> 
> Jon

__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.