Re: Failover-Failback without any Load-Balancing

Hi. Thanks for the answer.

I divided 
"(t_branch_timeout() and !t_branch_replied())" 
into 
"t_branch_timeout() or !t_branch_replied()" 
to get more chanses to trigger ds_next_dst.
In this case of this
(t_check_status("503|408") or t_branch_timeout() or !t_branch_replied())
I believe kamailio should trigger if any of these conditions hit.

I haven't tried t_branch_timeout() yet.

But so far only this code worked pretty much well for me

request_route {
    if (is_method("INVITE|REGISTER")){
    	rewritehost("10.0.0.65");
    	t_on_failure("FAILOVER");
    	t_relay_to_tcp("10.0.0.65","5060");
    	exit;
    }

failure_route[FAILOVER] {
    rewritehost("10.0.0.75");
    t_relay_to_tcp("10.0.0.75","5060");
    exit;
}
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!