WSGI 'pre-PEP'
"Michael C. Neel" <[email protected]> Wed, 11 Aug 2004 14:24:34 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.albatross.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Mediapulse, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I'm sure some of the Object Craft guys and others on this list are also on the Web SIG list as well, and have seen the threads on this proposal. I've posted to the SIG before and will still say I do not completely understand what problem this pep is trying to solve. In the past i've not really bothered to understand, but now in the context of is it something I might need to address in SnakeSkin or not I curious on other thoughts here. The pep seems to want to alter the way an albatross app is setup and used. The goal seems to be gaining the ability of taking the application to any server, but i think it misses the concept of there may be a framework (like albatross) inbetween the server and app. Also, albatross already abstracts this though request objects, and after the last round of refactoring these are trivial to add. So, like I said I'm not 100% on what the pep is actually proposing, but I'm curious for the users and developers of Albatross to weigh in on this and how it affects our doesn't affect albatross. Mike __________________________________ [email protected] vice president of information systems 865.675.4455 x30 800.380.4514 www.mediapulse.com __________________________________