10 High-ROI Redesign Priorities
[email protected] (Jakob Nielsen) Mon, 12 Mar 2007 08:30:00 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.alertbox |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <SPARKLIST-7313542-5917782-2007.03.12-08.30.02--gcwa-alertbox#[email protected]> |
Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox for March 12 is now online at: > http://www.useit.com/alertbox/roi.html Summary: Several usability findings lead directly to higher sales and increased customer loyalty. These design tactics should be your first priority when updating your website. ---------------------------------- Usability Week 2007 conference > Washington, D.C., April 22-27 > London, May 6-11 > San Francisco, June 18-23 * 3-day camp: usability in practice * 3-day immersion: interaction design * 10 full-day tutorials, including 2 new days on application usability Full program: > http://www.nngroup.com/events DEADLINE to save 10% on advance registration for Washington DC: next Friday, March 23 ---------------------------------- Features = Frustration Mobile phone users rate "function fatigue" as their No. 1 complaint according to a new survey. Of course, you should never use surveys as the basis for user interface design decisions. For that you need behavioral research where you observe people as they use a design. Surveys don't tell you what's wrong or how to fix it, the way user testing does. Surveys do tell you about users' frustrations, and this one says that people are annoyed with the plethora of features on current mobile phones. The answer could be better usability for the existing features, fewer features, or a combination of the two. A survey can't differentiate these options. However, note that more features constitute a usability problem in their own right, because every additional feature adds a burden to the UI and thus makes the *other* features harder to use. > http://tinyurl.com/2mcyt6 The answer could even be better demos and training, as stated in the above article, but I don't think so. It is a fallacy to believe that more training is the answer because users complain about training in a survey. More likely, the answer is *less* training, which can be achieved through usability improvements. The survey also found that Americans and Western Europeans are the most bothered by loud mobile phone conversations. This could be because Asians are more polite when talking on the phone, but it's more likely to be because Americans and Europeans are more willing to complain about other people. This is another point where empirical research data is better than gathering survey opinions. For a start, see this study of why Europeans find other people's mobile phone conversations annoying: > http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20040412.html ---------------------------------- Greetings from Shanghai Last week we kicked off this year's conference tour in Hong Kong. We had a very successful event and it was invigorating to meet the many Asian user experience professionals and hear about their projects. At the time of posting for this newsletter, I have moved on to Shanghai, though the mailing obviously goes out from our trusty service provider back in the States. Shanghai is a boom town without comparison and clearly the exponent for where the world is moving. I am taking advantage of bringing a crack usability team to Asia: we are testing a bunch of sites with Chinese users. We're testing both Chinese sites and Western sites, because we need to generate guidelines for the audience at our upcoming conferences in the U.S. and U.K.. It's actually more important to most of our clients how Chinese users use foreign sites than how they use Chinese sites, since most companies can't afford to build a fully localized site. There are certainly interesting differences between Asian users and the American, European, and Australian users we test in most of our studies. Details to come at the presentations later in the year once we have analyzed the data fully. But the most interesting finding from our current tests is "the dog that didn't bark" to refer to Sherlock Holmes. For most of the things we tested, there was NO DIFFERENCE in the usability guidelines between Asia and other parts of the world. This is similar to findings in our studies in Japan and Korea. For example, take financial journalists in Hong Kong. A hugely important group to consider when designing the investor relations (IR) and public relations (PR) sites for any big multinational corporation, which is why we tested these users to get material for our upcoming seminar on presenting information about a company on its website. Most of what Hong Kong financial journalists need from your website is the same as the financial journalists we have already tested in New York, London, and Copenhagen. In other words, the differences between the peoples of the world are not as great as they are sometimes made out to be. At least not when it comes to the usability guidelines for Web design.