Location is Irrelevant for Usability Studies
[email protected] (Jakob Nielsen) Mon, 30 Apr 2007 02:00:00 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.alertbox |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <SPARKLIST-7313542-6188683-2007.04.30-02.00.22--gcwa-alertbox#[email protected]> |
Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox for April 30 is now online at: > http://www.useit.com/alertbox/user-test-locations.html Summary: You get the same insights regardless of where you conduct user testing, so there's no reason to test in multiple cities. When a city is dominated by your own industry, however, you should definitely test elsewhere. ---------------------------------- Usability Week 2007 conference > London, May 6-11 > San Francisco, June 18-23 In-depth training: > 3-day Intensive Camp: Usability in Practice > 3-day Immersion: Tog on Interaction Design 10 specialized full-day tutorials: > Fundamental Guidelines for Web Usability > Application Usability (2 days) > Intranet Usability (2 days) > B2B Sites > Websites That Sell > Presenting Company Information on Corporate Websites > E-Mail Newsletter Usability > Writing for the Web > http://www.nngroup.com/events Save £140 on London registration: DEADLINE this Friday, May 3 ---------------------------------- STUDENT VOLUNTEERS NEEDED We need students to help staff our conference in San Francisco in June (see above). Pretty light workload, and you get to meet hundreds of usability professionals from many leading companies. Plus, of course, our illustrious speakers, and free access to cutting-edge seminars with practical information that they just don't teach at uni. A great opportunity for graduate students (or even advanced undergrads) in usability, human factors, HCI, and related fields. To apply, send a short resume plus the name and email address of your main professor to [email protected] ---------------------------------- UE AND THE BOTTOM LINE AT EBAY eBay reported record profits for Q1. This despite the fact that the number of auction LISTINGS only increased by 2%. However, merchandise SOLD increased by 14%. In presenting the record numbers, the CEO, Meg Whitman, said that "the company had been benefiting from changes in the user experience that had increased the number of auctions leading to sales" (as quoted in The New York Times, April 19). This is a great example of the benefits of usability for e-commerce: income comes from multiplying the amount of use with the conversion rate. The more you improve the user experience of finding products, researching them, and buying them, the higher your conversion rate. Yet most sites invest vastly more in bringing in new traffic (increasing an almost-irrelevant "unique user" count) than they invest in making these users convert. The cost of doubling traffic is a hugely expensive advertising campaign. Doubling conversion costs a modest usability project to identify your users' main pain points followed by targeted redesigns of those elements. Much cheaper and a sustainable advantage, whereas traffic brought in by ads will subside when your advertising budget runs out. More on usability ROI: > http://www.nngroup.com/reports/roi In eBay's case, user experience is so important for profits that it's one of the main things the CEO mentions to the financial press in presenting the quarterly results. eBay has a particularly competent user experience department, but smaller companies usually find that a smaller usability effort can increase their financial performance materially. Your first usability test will uncover a gold mine of low-hanging fruit, to mix metaphors. New York Times article about eBay (paid access): > http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/19/technology/19ebay.html