Aspects of Design Quality
[email protected] (Jakob Nielsen) Mon, 03 Nov 2008 03:10:00 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.alertbox |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <SPARKLIST-7313542-11805382-2008.11.03-03.10.04--gcwa-alertbox#[email protected]> |
Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox for November 3 is now online at: > http://www.useit.com/alertbox/quality-correlations.html Summary: Usability scores for 51 websites shows some correlation between navigation, content, and feature quality, but no connections to other usability areas. ---------------------------------- User Experience 2008 conference > Chicago, November 2-7 > Amsterdam, November 16-21 In-depth training: > 31 full-day tutorials Keynote presentations: > Don Norman: Sociable Design > Chris Nodder: Usability for Evil Full program: > http://www.nngroup.com/events DEADLINE to save 150 on Amsterdam registration: NEXT FRIDAY, Nov. 14 The Chicago conference is now in full swing: we kicked it off to a rousing start yesterday. A big crowd with a lot of questions, that's for sure, so I finished my first presentation 8 minutes late (sorry). ---------------------------------- VALUE OF TARGETING NEWSLETETRS At the recent Gomez Web Experience conference, I heard an interesting presentation by Zach Zimet (manager of email marketing at a major consumer electronics retailer) about the benefits of targeting email newsletters more closely than sending the same to all subscribers. In his case study, business metrics improved by 31% by targeting the email to focus on a topic that the subscriber had been browsing intensely on the website during recent visits. This, of course, proves the value of an integrated approach to the two media, which was the point of the presentation. The 31% improvement definitely produces high ROI from a fairly small effort, but it's in line with what we expect from our other research, so that's not the reason I report on Zimet's talk. An issue that he raised as a sidebar is of deeper importance: He could as well have reported a 500% improvement in business metrics, because that's the difference between customers getting the targeted newsletter and customers getting the generic newsletter. But there's a hidden covariant - something that people with poor statistics skills often overlook. Here, the hidden variable is whether the customer had been visiting the website recently. All the subscribers who received targeted newsletters fall into this category, whereas most of the other subscribers would not have been on the site for some time (after all, the main purpose of an email newsletter is to keep in touch with customers between their visits to your site). Resuming heavy browsing of a company's website is a major buying signal, so *of course* people who start engaging intensely with a specific area of the site will be more likely to generate positive metrics - whether or not you send them a special newsletter. This is the stronger of the two effects, so when you parcel out the relative contribution of recent heavy browsing vs. targeted newsletters, the benefit of the targeted newsletter turns out to be "only" 31%. Design guidelines for email newsletters: > http://www.nngroup.com/reports/newsletters ---------------------------------- MULTI-TASKING = LOSING FOCUS Nice New York Times summary of the research on what happens when users switch their attention between different applications and tasks: > http://tinyurl.com/multitask As I have said before, the best way to boost your productivity is to switch off IM, Twitter, and the like and refrain from checking your email more than once per hour. Even the shortest interruption costs you several minutes of productivity as you switch your brain back into gear for your main task, particularly if you have a knowledge-intensive job. 10 Steps for Cleaning Up Information Pollution: > http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20040105.html