Guesses vs. Data as Basis for Design Recommendations
[email protected] (Jakob Nielsen) Mon, 08 Jun 2009 10:00:00 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.alertbox |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <SPARKLIST-7313542-14112569-2009.06.08-10.00.02--gcwa-alertbox#[email protected]> |
Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox for June 8 is now online at: > http://www.useit.com/alertbox/guesses-data.html Summary: Even the tiniest amount of empirical facts (say, observing 2 users) vastly improves the probability of making correct UI design decisions. ---------------------------------- Usability Week 2009 conference > San Francisco, June 22-27 > New York City, July 13-17 > Sydney, July 27-August 1 In-depth training: > 3-day camp on Usability in Practice Specialized topics: > 14 in-depth tutorials Full program: > http://www.nngroup.com/events THIS Friday, June 12 is the deadline for: > NEW YORK - save 10% by using the early-bird rate NEXT Friday, June 19 is the deadline for: > SAN FRANCISCO - save $200 through advance registration > SYDNEY save 10% by using the early-bird rate ---------------------------------- CALL FOR ENTRIES: Intranet Design Annual Think you have a good intranet? Submit it for the award: > http://www.nngroup.com/reports/intranet/2010 Deadline: July 11 ---------------------------------- PRODUCT REVIEWS EMPHASIZE USABILITY Two interesting discussions of usability issues in The New York Times' review of the new Palm Pre touchphone: > http://tr.im/PreReview "[certain operations] can be very slow [...] and there's no progress bar or hourglass to let you know that it's still working." and "the Pre is not quite as simple as the iPhone. All those extra features, by definition, mean that there's more to learn." Three observations: a) Usability has definitely become a key part of many product reviews these days, in major newspapers (as here) and in the trade press. This, of course, means that simpler UI sells more products because it means better reviews. b) I am particularly pleased by the recognition of my long-standing point that more features can be bad. In the old days, the press reviewed tech products purely on a feature checklist basis, which meant that the product with the most features scored highest. Now, excess features can hurt your review, which is how it should be. c) It's interesting to see a big family newspaper discuss design details like progress bars, which used to be the domain solely of usability geeks. I wrote about them in 1993: > http://www.useit.com/papers/responsetime.html We're going mainstream, people...