Corporate Blogs - Front Page Structure
[email protected] (Jakob Nielsen) Mon, 09 Aug 2010 06:10:00 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.alertbox |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <SPARKLIST-7313542-18017061-2010.08.09-06.10.01--gcwa-alertbox#[email protected]> |
Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox for August 9 is now online at: > http://www.useit.com/alertbox/blog-front-pages.html Summary: Showing summaries of many articles is more likely to draw in users than providing full articles, which can quickly exhaust reader interest. ---------------------------------- Usability Week 2010 conference * Toronto, Canada: starts today * San Francisco, CA: October 3-8 * Copenhagen, Denmark: October 18-22 * Edinburgh, Scotland: October 25-29 Full program: > http://www.nngroup.com/events ---------------------------------- HIGHER-CONTRAST KINDLE Amazon has announced a new version of the Kindle to ship later this month. They have increased 3 of their advantages relative to full-featured tablet computers: lighter weight, smaller size (while, crucially, maintaining the same screen size), and longer battery life. It'll be easier to hold and will now last through a 3-4 week trip on a single charge, which should be enough for most people. Leaving the charger at home makes your bag even lighter. A good example of attending to the total user experience. The screen is supposed to have "50% better contrast," however that's measured. My guess is that better contrast will give the new Kindle maybe 1-2% better reading speed than the old model, thus nudging it even closer to printed books. For the final big step up, to fully close the gap, we need higher resolution in terms of dots-per-inch, preferably around 300 dpi, which this model doesn't have. (So far, the iPhone 4 is the only computer with a truly crisp screen.) I am not going to bother running a measurement study to find out whether it's 1 or 2 percent we've gained in reading speed. It's not that important whether it's one or the other. For sure, it would not impact the reason we study *readers*, which is to generate guidelines for *writers* of electronic content: > http://www.useit.com/papers/webwriting Also, because the readability improvement is almost certainly tiny, it would be necessary to test about 2,000 users to gain statistical significance. Many people who don't understand statistics complain about usability studies with a small number of participants (for example, our recent test of the reading speed of tablets vs. books). The reason small studies work is that we are usually assessing huge effects. A lot of usability findings are big enough that websites almost double their business value after fixing them: > http://www.nngroup.com/reports/roi To study big effects, small samples are fine. (Especially if you don't care about the precise size: whether your conversion rate will increase by 90% or 95% doesn't matter you should improve the design in either case, so all you need to know is what's wrong with your site, not exactly how wrong it is.) ---------------------------------- FREE USABILITY TEST OF YOUR INTRANET We're looking for organizations to participate in our Intranet Research Study. Experts from NN/g will conduct a usability test of your intranet at your offices and give you the results in a post-test meeting with your team, for no fee. We will use your screenshots and stories to update our report series and our seminars. Deadline: August 13, 2010 > http://www.nngroup.com/reports/intranet/freetest ---------------------------------- SURVEY: EXPLAINING USABILITY TO MANAGEMENT Have you had had success or failure in convincing managers and colleagues about usability? We want to hear about your experience. What worked for you; what didn't. We are looking for responses from UX/design/IA/usability people, developers, managers, product managers, marketing, and other functional groups who affect design. Please answer a short questionnaire (takes about 5-10 minutes) and enter a drawing to win a Nielsen Norman Group report of your choice. Follow this link for the questionnaire: > http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/PLQGYJT ---------------------------------- GOOGLE GULLIBILITY AMONG STUDENTS New study finds that Google Gullibility is rampant among college students: > http://bit.ly/ResearchSkills This echoes our previous findings of the same phenomenon among mainstream users: > http://www.useit.com/alertbox/user-skills.html One would have hoped that students had sharper research skills, but no. Google Gullibility is the tendency to assign undue trust to whatever result is thrown up as the first by the search engine. The problem exists for all major search engines, and I just named it G.G. because of the alliteration.