Non-Profit Organization Websites
[email protected] (Jakob Nielsen) Wed, 16 Feb 2011 02:20:00 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.alertbox |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <SPARKLIST-7313542-18875442-2011.02.16-02.20.04--gcwa-alertbox#[email protected]> |
Giving money on charity websites is 7% harder than spending money on e-commerce sites. Donating physical items is even harder. For non-profit websites, social media is secondary; the top priority is to write clearer content. Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox for February 16: > http://www.useit.com/alertbox/nonprofit-donations.html ---------------------------------- Usability Week 2011 conference * Hong Kong: February 28-March 4 * Melbourne: March 7-11 * London: April 3-8 * Washington, DC: April 18-22 * Minneapolis: May 9-13 Full program: > http://www.nngroup.com/events DEADLINE: * Next Friday, February 25 * save $136 on advance registration for HONG KONG ---------------------------------- MINNEAPOLIS CONFERENCE Announcing the Usability Week Minneapolis conference: > http://www.nngroup.com/events/minneapolis/agenda.html First-time ever event in Minnesota. ---------------------------------- HUFFINGTON POST TRAFFIC VALUE The New York Times calculated that The Huffington Post made 0.6 cents per page view in 2010: > http://bit.ly/eOnESz By comparison, in 1998, I calculated that Yahoo made 0.4 cents per page view: > http://www.useit.com/alertbox/981101.html It might seem that HuffPost is 50% better than Yahoo at monetizing low-value generic content. But cumulative inflation from 1998-2010 was 34%. So in fact they are only 16% better than Yahoo was in 1998. These numbers indicate that we are in a second bubble, with a new generation of clueless marketing managers overpaying for non-niche traffic. ---------------------------------- CASE STUDIES WANTED: MEASURABLE IMPACT OF DESIGN CHANGES Please share your improved usability examples, and get a free NN/g report: > http://www.nngroup.com/reports/roi/metrics.html ---------------------------------- EUROPE'S MOBILE PLATFORMS: the mighty have fallen In 2001, I wrote a column titled "Mobile Phones: Europe's Next Minitel?" > http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20010107.html My main points were: * Telephones are ill suited for mobile Internet access * A deck-of-cards form factor is superior * It's OK to lose the tactile aspect of pushing keypad buttons At the time, most "analysts" expected Europe to be the leader in inventing and implementing the mobile Internet. Based on the above points, I predicted that Europe's advantages in mobile telephony (at the time) would lead innovation astray, causing companies to miss the bigger opportunities provided by more suitable devices. 10 years later, this prediction has finally played out, as Nokia hoisted the white flag and switched to the Windows Mobile platform instead of designing its own. Ericsson gave up on its own platform some time ago. I am a bit sad that my 10-year old prediction was proven right, since Ericsson was one of my first consulting clients, back in the 1980s. They had pretty good human factors people at the time. Nokia has a great usability team, and was one of the very few companies (if not the only one) to conduct field studies on mobile design for third world countries. Apparently, management didn't listen to their UX people. Is all lost for mobile in Europe? Maybe not. Traditionally, I would say that an integrated approach to the design of the user experience is superior, especially when the UI is as limited as it has to be on mobile devices. The more constraints, the more important to make everything work tightly together. This analysis favors mobile platform companies like Apple, HP (Palm), and RIM (BlackBerry) that develop both software, hardware, and mobile services within a single design. In contrast, divorcing hardware, software, and services by placing them in different companies risks creating a less refined total user experience because the three won't be as tightly integrated. Disadvantage Microsoft/Nokia and Google/Motorola/Ericsson. However, despite this theory, recent Android devices tested almost as good as iPhone in the usability studies we conducted recently, after I decided to broaden our course on touchscreen usability to cover devices beyond Apple's: > http://www.nngroup.com/events/tutorials/mobile_apps.html Android mobiles have gained very fast. Who knows, next year they may even be better than Apple. Microsoft and Nokia can do the same. But they have to focus on tight integration of the total user experience.