Re: annotations on http://www.w3.org/ vs http://www.w3.org/2001/Annotea/

Thanks Irene!

I don't know if every annotation on http://www.w3.org/ has a space in the 
path while the annotations on http://www.w3.org/2001/Annotea/ do not. But 
maybe they do because the home page has all that structure.

If you want me to check again, I'm happy to do it, but I need a new binary. 
Let me know what is convenient for you.

And thanks again for the correction!

Marja

At 01:10 PM 7/12/2004 +0200, Irene Vatton wrote:
>On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 13:22:29 -0400
>Marja-Riitta Koivunen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > I get annotatations fine on http://www.w3.org/2001/Annotea/ both with 
> Amaya
> > 8.5 release version and new development version of Amaya 8.6 dated June 28
> > 2004.
> >
> > However, I can get annotations on http://www.w3.org/ only with Amaya 8.5.
> > Amaya 8.6 does not show anything, it just complains that it failed to get
> > the annotation index.
> >
> > I wonder if Amaya 8.6 is not handling something on http://www.w3.org/ 
> right
> > and that messes the annotations?
> >
> > This does not sound like a server bug to me.
> >
> > Marja
>
>I found and fixed a bug with annotation icons: they are not displayed when 
>the
>icon path includes spaces.
>I'm not sure it's exactly the problem you met.
>I let Jose check with you after his vacation.
>
>Regards
>      Irene.
>-----
>Irène Vatton                     INRIA Rhône-Alpes
>INRIA                               ZIRST
>e-mail: [email protected]       655 avenue de l'Europe
>Tel.: +33 4 76 61 53 61             Montbonnot
>Fax:  +33 4 76 61 52 07             38334 Saint Ismier Cedex - France