Re: Struggling with memory problem using Search Query

Zembower, Kevin <kzembowe-pdIAO+f/[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I thought that maybe I could generate a Search report by not using the
> entire lists available in SearchEngines.txt and SearchQuery.txt.
> Instead, I'm trying to just look at the top ten search engines that
> refer to my site. I started with Google. I entered this in my Analog
> config file:
> 
> # Creating Search Query and Word reports here
> REFARGSEXCLUDE *                #Reject all ref arguments, to prevent
> seg fault with 12 months of data, then
> REFARGSINCLUDE /search* #accept only the one for Google.

Why not just use REFINCLUDE *.google.*. Your problem is not that your list of search engines is too big, it's that your list of log entries is too big. By excluding every entry that wasn't referred by Google, you should be well able to report on just the Google Search terms. If you're primarily interested in the Search Reports, you need to use the LOWMEM commands for everything _except_ the Referrers - that's the information that you want.

Aengus

+------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list:
|    http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help
|
|  Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html
|  List archives:  http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives
|  Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general
+------------------------------------------------------------------------