Re: Referrer report - what it shows exactly and why it lists only foreign sites
"Natalia Lis" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.analog.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello, The site has dozens of millions requests per day so I think the floor of 20 is good. Also, the graphs that we share are embedded images; they are displayed on other sites, but are hosted on our websites. Based on what you wrote, I'm not surprised that the Referrer report only lists referrers for about 5% of all requests. The site is very busy with graphics and I suppose that most users have it bookmarked. The difference between a referrer report and a referring site report is that the former lists URLs while the latter lists websites? So if a website shows our graphs on two different pages, the referrer report will show 2 urls, while the referring site report will show one website address? "If you want not to count referrers to images, you can use the command REQINCLUDE pages" This is interesting. So it will only count instances when another website links to us and a person clicks on that link and actually visits our site? Let's say we have a graph: www.oursite.com/graph and it is embedded on another website in the following way: <A HREF="http://www.oursite.com"><IMG SRC="http://www.oursite.com/graph"></a> If I follow Stephen's recommendation, the report will only count clicks on the graph, not just requests for an updated image? Thanks for your help, Natalia On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 1:56 AM, Stephen Turner < [email protected]> wrote: > In addition to everything Aengus said, have a look in your raw > logfiles. You will soon understand which lines have referrers on, and > what those referrers typically look like. Analog just counts those up. > > If you want not to count referrers to images, you can use the command > REQINCLUDE pages > This will restrict all the reports to just the lines in your logfile > corresponding to pages. But having said that, I'm not sure that's the > right command for you. If other sites are including your images, you > might actually want to analyse that traffic. Of course, you could do > one report with and one report without that command. > > -- > Stephen Turner > +------------------------------------------------------------------------ > | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: > | http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help > | > | Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html > | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives > | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general > +------------------------------------------------------------------------ > +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help | | Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general +------------------------------------------------------------------------