Re: Still in development?

Although Analog is not under what I would call active development, I 
don't see how that would be an issue. Analog does what it does very very 
well. There is little that could be done without changing the scope of 
the program. When problems do come up, which is extremely rare these 
days, there are a number of people here who can fix them.

To my mind it has much more to do with what you are trying to 
accomplish. If you want what Analog does, there is no better choice. But 
there are features which Analog choses not to address. A number of these 
Analog does not address because they are impossible. For example, any 
attempt to count visits is an illusion. A number of other products are 
happy to offer you that illusion, Analog offers you facts. If you need 
one or more of those features you may want to look elsewhere.

Jason


Joelle Tegwen wrote:
> 
> We're looking for a new log analyzer. The two that consistently came
> up were AWStats and Analog. Analog seems like a great product, but it
> seems to be no longer under development. We don't have anyone on staff
> who could update this so if updates or changes needed to be made, we
> would be out of luck.
> 
> Is it worth it to start using Analog now? Are there current open bugs
> that are a concern? How would we deal with new browsers/OS (like
> Vista)? Or is this project going away and we should look elsewhere for
> a log analyzer?
> 
> Are there other issues I should be aware of?

+------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list:
|    http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help
|
|  Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html
|  List archives:  http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives
|  Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general
+------------------------------------------------------------------------