Re: Report duration

Jeremy Wadsack wrote:
> ROWS has to do with data in a single report. FROM and TO are used 
> constrain the time period analog reports on. Check if you have those set.
> 
> More likely analog is not seeing all your log files. If you enable DEBUG 
> then analog will tell you exactly which files it's reading. That's where 
> I'd start.
> 
> Hope that helps,

Thanks Jeremy, it does.  It let me know what to look for to discover 
that the problem seems to be nothing to do with with Analog, but 
something I still haven't found to do with logrotate.  The log files are 
all being processed, but for some reason as yet unidentified, they don't 
contain any more info than Analog is showing - two of the 5 weekly files 
that exist (building towards 17) are empty...

Ho hum...

Roger

>     On Feb 27, 2009 5:10 PM, "Roger" <roger-GJGk2I+t4HdQBPPSbDAOU9Bc4/[email protected]
>     <mailto:roger-GJGk2I+t4HdQBPPSbDAOU9Bc4/[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>     I installed Analog on my Centos 5 server and got good reports, but
>     the duration was only about a month, which meant that the monthly
>     report gave traffic volumes for this month plus the mirror section
>     of last month: on, say, the 5th, the most popular month was the last
>     one, while on the 27th, it was this one.
> 
>     I could see that this might well be because the log rotation deleted
>     logs older than 4 weeks.
> 
>     Accordingly I altered the logging system to retain site logs for a
>     full quarter.
> 
>     To my dismay, Analog reports now cover a shorter period, not a
>     longer one.  Prima facie, the reports now only cover the current
>     month, not the whole period in the logs.
> 
>     Obviously I'm doing something wrong - and probably stupid.
> 
>     Google didn't offer me any help I could recognise - again, that may
>     well be my fault.
> 
>     Similarly, searching the Analog documentation didn't show me
>     anything I recognised as being the answer (ROWS might be relevant,
>     but I don't understand how to use that - when it used to give me two
>     rows, but now doesn't.)
> 
>     Can anyone point me in the right direction, please?
> 
>     Roger
> 
>     ______________________________________________________________________
>     This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
>     For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
>     ______________________________________________________________________
>     +------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     |  TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list:
>     |    http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help
>     |
>     |  Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html
>     |  List archives:  http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives
>     |  Usenet version:
>     news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general
>     <http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general>
>     +------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________
+------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list:
|    http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help
|
|  Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html
|  List archives:  http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives
|  Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general
+------------------------------------------------------------------------