Re: heuristic evaluation - large set - one evaluator
Maciej Kos <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.chi-web |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dear Justin, William and Joe, Thank you so much for your feedback. I really appreciate it. I will certainly use cognitive walk through and make good use (hopefully) of the links you provided. I will also probably bug you again :) Thanks again and if you have any other suggestions (books maybe?), don't hesitate to contact me here or off list. Best, Maciej On Dec 14, 2007 1:34 PM, Joe Leech <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 12/12/2007, Maciej Kos <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I would like to perform a heuristic evaluation of a large set of > > websites of the same theme (n>130). Have you come across any similar > > research with only one or two evaluators? I am especially interested > > in methodology. > > > > Thanks for help in advance! > > Maciej > > I've something similar but used the slightly more robust Cognitive > Walkthrough which far easier to use when comparing interfaces: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_walkthrough > > It's also has a slightly *cough* more robust academic basis to it than > good ol' heuristics > > I've also use the cognitive jogthrough as all of these analysis > methods can be as dull as dishwater: > http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=142869 > > HTH > > joe > > > > > > > -- > ***************************************************** > joeleech.net +447905 33 4163 > -------------------------------------------------------------- Tip of the Day: Postings must be in plain text CHI-WEB: www.sigchi.org/web POSTINGS: mailto:[email protected] MODERATORS: mailto:[email protected] SUBSCRIPTION CHANGES & FAQ: www.sigchi.org/web/faq.html --------------------------------------------------------------