Re: recommendations for remote unattended usability testing tools (3)

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.chi-web
Message-ID <080920081609.23573.489DC125000D62A900005C1522070209539B9B010C9C0A0207089F0A9C0106@comcast.net>
Sorry to chime in late.  I felt a bit like the magazine was mixing two concepts:  
 
1) Remote testing:  Log into another person's computer, record their activity,  
etc.  Facilitate by audio if at all.  UserVue is a great tool for that, and has the  
advantage of logging lots of computer activity as well as your own observations  
and those of others.
 
 2) Unmoderated testing: Limit or eliminate moderation with your testing; location may or may not be defined.   Morae 3 has a new function where you can provide tasks 
and surveys automatically, and conduct testing without a moderator, or with  
limited facilitation. 

Disclaimer:  I am a UX researcher for the company that makes both products:  
TechSmith.  

Josie Scott
 

 > On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Kay Corry Aubrey <[email protected]
 > > wrote:
 > 
 > > Hi -
 > > I just finished reading the very excellent latest issue of "UX", which
 > > focuses on various types of remote usability testing. I was wondering if
 > > people on the list have experience with remote unattended testing and could
 > > suggest some companies that have reliable and reasonably priced products.
 > >
 > > I'll collect people's responses and send them back to the list.
 > >
 > > Thanks!
 > >
 > > Kay
 > >
 > > Kay Corry Aubrey
 > > Usability Resources Inc
 > > End user research and interaction design for software
 > > www.UsabilityResources.net
 > > 781-275-3020
> > >
> > >
> > >    --------------------------------------------------------------
> > >    Tip of the Day: Use the archives to research common questions
> > >     CHI-WEB: www.sigchi.org/web POSTINGS: mailto:[email protected]
> > >              MODERATORS: mailto:[email protected]
> > >       SUBSCRIPTION CHANGES & FAQ:  www.sigchi.org/web/faq.html
> > >    --------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Richard W. Baker
> > Web Designer / Developer
> > [email protected] | 904.314.2829 | www.rwbaker.com
> > 
> >     --------------------------------------------------------------
> >         Tip of the Day: Forward out-of-office replies to
> >                     mailto:[email protected]
> >      CHI-WEB: www.sigchi.org/web POSTINGS: mailto:[email protected]
> >               MODERATORS: mailto:[email protected]
> >        SUBSCRIPTION CHANGES & FAQ:  www.sigchi.org/web/faq.html
> >     --------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > ------------------------------
> > 
> > Date:    Thu, 7 Aug 2008 11:32:26 +0200
> > From:    Mathijs Panhuijsen <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Best Web technology from usability perspective
> > 
> > Hello everybody,
> > 
> > =20
> > 
> > My company is looking into choosing a new Web technology for building
> > their next generation GUI (browser-based).
> > 
> > They are considering options ranging from a homebrew AJAX-based system
> > to the Google Web Toolkit to Microsoft Silverlight.
> > 
> > =20
> > 
> > My question to you is:
> > 
> > Which Web technology would you recommend for building a RIA, purely from
> > a usability point of view?
> > 
> > We're talking here about a very rich application with loads of
> > functionality, not an 'interactive Web site'.
> > 
> > In other words, which Web technology works best to develop the most
> > usable interfaces the quickest?
> > 
> > =20
> > 
> > Kind regards,
> > 
> > =20
> > 
> > Mathijs Panhuijsen
> > 
> > Technical Writer
> > 
> > SDL Tridion
> > 
> > =20
> > 
> > =20
> > 
> > =20
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > This e-mail is intended exclusively for the addressee(s),and may not be =
> > passed on to, or made available for use by any person other than the =
> > addressee(s).SDL Tridion rules out any and every liability resulting =
> > from any electronic transmission.
> > 
> >     --------------------------------------------------------------
> >            Tip of the Day: Postings must be in plain text
> >      CHI-WEB: www.sigchi.org/web POSTINGS: mailto:[email protected]
> >               MODERATORS: mailto:[email protected]
> >        SUBSCRIPTION CHANGES & FAQ:  www.sigchi.org/web/faq.html
> >     --------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > ------------------------------
> > 
> > End of CHI-WEB Digest - 4 Aug 2008 to 7 Aug 2008 (#2008-43)
> > ***********************************************************
> > 
> 

    --------------------------------------------------------------
    Tip of the Day: Use the archives to research common questions
     CHI-WEB: www.sigchi.org/web POSTINGS: mailto:[email protected]
              MODERATORS: mailto:[email protected]
       SUBSCRIPTION CHANGES & FAQ:  www.sigchi.org/web/faq.html
    --------------------------------------------------------------
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.