C + S - recommendations for remote unattended usability test products
Kay Corry Aubrey <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.chi-web |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <008901c8fc82$41ccd4b0$c5667e10$@net> |
Here are the responses I received from my request for products that do remote unattended usability testing. Thanks to everyone who contributed - Kay THE RESPONSES *********************************** Take a look at Silverback. It's especially great if you're testers are on an Apple laptop with a webcam. It records the screen and the user during testing http://silverbackapp.com/ -rich **************************************** Good morning Kay, I am familiar with Bolt | Peters' work on remote user testing, their product is called Ethnio. boltpeters.com Regards, Rebecca Evans *************************************** Dear Kay, Sabrina Mach, and myself are launching a new start up called FeraLabs in September. FeraLabs was started because Sabrina while at University College London needed effective Remote Usability Testing Software. The systems on offer were either too expenses, too difficult to setup or didn't work. So we started to develop Webnographer. Webnographer is a Asynchronous Remote Usablity Testing Software (i.e. unattended/unmoderated). The major differentials with Webnographer, compared to the products mentioned in UX magazine are that:- . It will offer faster insight into Usablity issues through easy to interpret graphical representations. We have focused most of the development time not just on collecting data, but how to gain insight into the data quickly, how to find the issues and how to show these visually. We have based the methods we use on academic research, such as information scent, eye-hand coordination, and implicit interactions. . To use Webnographer, the site under evaluation does not need to be modified in any way, and participants do not have to download anything to their pc - unlike the other commercial remote testing software mentioned in UX magazine. . We aim also to be cheaper than the competition, but as the article in UX magazine points out that the major time factor is in the data analysis. As Susan Fowler (she used to work at Keynote) points out the time needed for a test is 5 weeks. Our belief is that with Webnographer the time needed can be significantly be reduced. Currently, the system is been tested at the University of Sussex in England, and once that is completed we will be looking for companies that we can work with to test the system. During the testing period we will be offering a reduced rate for the system of $20.00 per participant. This compares with $40.00 to $65.00 per participant for the products listed in UX magazine. Please get in touch if you are wanting to be involved in some of our early tests, or if you require further information. All the best James Page *************************************** Sorry to chime in late. I felt a bit like the magazine was mixing two concepts: 1) Remote testing: Log into another person's computer, record their activity, etc. Facilitate by audio if at all. UserVue is a great tool for that, and has the advantage of logging lots of computer activity as well as your own observations and those of others. 2) Unmoderated testing: Limit or eliminate moderation with your testing; location may or may not be defined. Morae 3 has a new function where you can provide tasks and surveys automatically, and conduct testing without a moderator, or with limited facilitation. Disclaimer: I am a UX researcher for the company that makes both products: TechSmith. Josie Scott *************************************** ORIGINAL MESSAGE From: Kay Corry Aubrey <[email protected]> Date: Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 7:50 PM Subject: recommendations for remote unattended usability testing tools To: [email protected] Hi - I just finished reading the very excellent latest issue of "UX", which focuses on various types of remote usability testing. I was wondering if people on the list have experience with remote unattended testing and could suggest some companies that have reliable and reasonably priced products. I'll collect people's responses and send them back to the list. Thanks! Kay Kay Corry Aubrey Usability Resources Inc End user research and interaction design for software www.UsabilityResources.net 781-275-3020 -------------------------------------------------------------- Tip of the Day: Forward out-of-office replies to mailto:[email protected] CHI-WEB: www.sigchi.org/web POSTINGS: mailto:[email protected] MODERATORS: mailto:[email protected] SUBSCRIPTION CHANGES & FAQ: www.sigchi.org/web/faq.html --------------------------------------------------------------