Re: invluding navigation on process pages
William Hudson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.chi-web |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Erica - I personally would agree with your marketing department, as would Amazon, I believe. Global navigation and panels potentially distract users from the task in hand. They will end up leaving the process without necessarily realizing it and will be very frustrated if they then use the browser back button to discover that their data is gone. Provide just a 'Cancel' button instead. Regards, William Hudson Syntagm Ltd Design for Usability US Toll Free 1-866-SYNTAGM UK 01235-522859 World +44-1235-522859 mailto:[email protected] http://www.syntagm.co.uk http://www.designforusability.com Syntagm is a limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered number: 1895345. Registered office: 10 Oxford Road, Abingdon OX14 2DS. > -----Original Message----- > From: ACM SIGCHI WWW Human Factors (Open Discussion) [mailto:CHI- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Erica Gordon Sorohan > Sent: 10 November 2008 21:39 > To: [email protected] > Subject: invluding navigation on process pages > > Has anyone had any firsthand experience with, or know of any research > conducted on, the effect of including or not including global > navigation on process pages... -------------------------------------------------------------- Tip of the Day: Postings must be in plain text CHI-WEB: www.sigchi.org/web POSTINGS: mailto:[email protected] MODERATORS: mailto:[email protected] SUBSCRIPTION CHANGES & FAQ: www.sigchi.org/web/faq.html --------------------------------------------------------------