Re: Best Practices for Web Ads?
Michael Kay <[email protected]> Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:01:09 -0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.chi-web |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
From my days in the past working at newspapers and magazines, it was constantly a struggle in the balance of advertising and content, and judgment calls had to me made based on experience. We maintained that while the content had to be superior in every case, advertising would get placement in such a way to be best noticed. If the copy and the ads were both clearly distinguished, in the way the page was divided, it was said to serve both better the advertising and editorial goals. Some magazines succeed by placing several pages of ads up front (or in the back) with little or no editorial content, as the ads take on a life of their own. In pages mixed with ads, I found that the ads in some cases even helped the layout of articles that occupied less than an entire page. In the web we have seen pop-ups and interstitials, which in a newspaper or magazine would be the equivalent of putting the ad at the top of the page above the article, forcing the reader/user to recognize it before the content. You get more clicks this way, but it is hardly a good way to create good will with your users in either mission of advertising or content. They tend to feel that the content is filler for the forced ads, and the users can create negative associations toward those advertisers who are thrust on them. And eventually the effectiveness of those techniques wear off as users grow accustomed to ignoring them. Google and others have worked on providing more relevant advertising. If advertising is smart, and made more relevant, the users would tend to have better associations with both the advertising and the content. So much as even the users may see the advertising as more of a value-added service rather than an intrusion. In this, the ads work best separated from the content and clearly distinguished as advertising. An easy, at-hand example would be a travel forum where an ad placed to the side of a discussion provides a means to buy an on-sale ticket or vacation package to the destination discussed. The ads can appear in a separate column on the page, or below the content, or somehow embedded in the content in such a way that is not confused as content. The idea is to make them clearly appear as ads, while not interrupting the user's experience with the content. Another thing to keep in mind, a crappy ad will never work no matter what you do. Well-made and relevant ads will. So a lot is at the mercy of what the advertisers provide. --Michael Kay 2011/4/28 Jeff Johnson <[email protected]> > Colleagues, > > A friend who is a webmaster for several sites, some for-profit and some > non-profit, asked me the following question: > > "Questions come up about a particular area of UX in our case -- the optimal > balance of content vs advertising elements in the design of a web page. If > advertising runs the show, we risk cheapening the value of our content and > brand; if content runs the show, advertising complains about lost revenue > opportunities. I'm hoping there might be some best practice guidelines > available from content providers who've fought these battles recently? Would > appreciate any pointers you can offer." > > We already checked Jakob's UseIt.com for relevant advice, and found some. > Does anyone have any other advice? > > Thanks, > Jeff Johnson > UI Wizards, Inc. > > -------------------------------------------------------------- Tip of the Day: Email mailto:[email protected] with any comments, questions or problems CHI-WEB: www.sigchi.org/resources/web/faq.html MODERATOR: mailto:[email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------