Fwd: [blink][edge][webkit] steps toward <style scoped> : first do no harm

Tantek Çelik <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.css.general
Message-ID <CAEV2_Wbtb0ZOcny5V1+5CFherihvu2tvaMcpk11B_6oCm=whCg@mail.gmail.com>
Forward of the last time we chatted about Scoped Style, per request
from Tab on today's telcon. -t


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Tab Atkins Jr. <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:56 PM
Subject: Re: [blink][edge][webkit] steps toward <style scoped> : first
do no harm
To: Tantek Çelik <[email protected]>
Cc: www-style list <[email protected]>


On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Tantek Çelik <[email protected]> wrote:
> I recently found a nice use-case for <style scoped> : per post custom
> styling, that would work not only on a post's permalink page, but also
> on a post when display in a stream, like on a home page.
>
> I had just created a bit of CSS for the recent "pride weekend" in San Francisco:
>
> http://tantek.com/2015/178/t1/lovewins-css3-pride-rainbow-background
>
> And decided I wanted to keep that custom rainbow bg styling on that
> post, while reverting other posts to their "normal" styling.
>
> I implemented this using <style scoped> and it worked exactly as expected:
>
> http://tantek.com/2015/185/t1/coded-per-post-styling-style-scoped
>
> On both the post by itself and when it was present in a list of posts
> like on my homepage.
>
> At least in Gecko.
>
> When I tried it other browsers, the rules from the <style scoped> leak
> out to the rest of the document, affecting all posts.
>
> E.g. this is a relatively recent Edge screenshot (via a friend)
>
> http://i.imgur.com/CUXPIJk.png
>
>
> Thus this is a request - short of fully implementing <style scoped>:
>
>
> ** Could Blink, Edge, and Webkit at least *not* apply <style scoped>? **
>
>
> I looked for such "first do no harm" bugs for each and couldn't find
> any, so I'm sending this message here to broaden awareness and
> hopefully get someone from each engine to file a bug and report back a
> publicly viewable URL for it so we can track it.

This would, in fact, do harm today.  If you'd proposed it years ago
when <style scoped> was first introduced, maybe, but now, there's
usage in the wild that puts an id on the scoping element and uses that
in the selectors inside of <style scoped>, so that it works in all
browsers (but hopefully gets performance benefits in those that
actually implement scoped='').  For example, several examples in the
Flexbox spec do this.

> That being said, if any other engine can share an intent to actually
> get <style scoped> working in some reasonable timeframe, that would be
> appreciated as well!

Chrome still doesn't have any current plans to implement this.

~TJ
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.