Re: [css-values] Readibility Poll

Zack Weinberg <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.css.general
Message-ID <CAKCAbMi-BydjjKsUugA5bYxtp+LwWowCdmu9o6j9hqwZkfo=OQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 7:56 PM, fantasai <[email protected]> wrote:
> Wrt resolution in
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016May/0209.html
> Preferences on wording?
>
> Version A:
>
>   If a ''url()''’s value starts with a U+0023 NUMBER SIGN (<code>#</code>),
>   parse and compute it as described above for relative URLs,
>   but always resolve that fragment against the currently-active base URL.
>   This reference must always be treated as same-document
>   (rather than cross-document).
>   Additionally, when serializing such a ''url()'',
>   serialize just the fragment.
>
> Version B:
>
>   If a ''url()''’s value starts with a U+0023 NUMBER SIGN (<code>#</code>),
>   parse it as per normal for URLs,
>   but additionally set the “local url flag” of the ''url()''.
>
>   When matching a ''url()'' with the <a>local url flag</a> set,
>   ignore everything but the URL's fragment,
>   and resolve that fragment against the current document
>   that relative URLs are resolved against.
>   This reference must always be treated as same-document
>   (rather than cross-document).
>
>   When serializing a ''url()'' with the <a>local url flag</a> set,
>   it must serialize as just the fragment.

I find A clearer and easier to follow.

zw
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.