Re: Agenda+ CSS Round Display Issues

I'm pretty sure this can be restricted to genus-0 topologies for quite a
while, and cover/contain could be extended to other values quantifying the
amount of coverage for less regular shapes.

On Tuesday, June 21, 2016, Lars Knudsen <[email protected]> wrote:

> he he - speaking of...
>
>
> http://www.stuff.tv/news/nintendo-considering-doughnut-shaped-3ds-replacement-say-reports
> (slight old - but still)
>
> br
> Lars
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Lars Knudsen <[email protected]
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jihye,
>>
>> that sounds great, thanks!  Does LG with with displays of other shapes
>> for e.g. appliances, cars, kiosk displays, etc?
>>
>> br
>> Lars
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 3:16 AM, Jihye Hong <[email protected]
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Lars,
>>>
>>> When LG suggested ideas of CSS Round Display, we wanted to apply the
>>> spec to the smart watch of LG with rounded display.
>>> So we added some features to support the rounded display, especially for
>>> circular display at first.
>>>
>>> But while developing the spec, we started to consider various shapes of
>>> displays.
>>> The shapes like oval, ellipse can be dealt with CSS Round Display
>>> because they are included in the boundary of "round display".
>>> Some features in the spec cover other than the rounded shape, such as
>>> the rounded rectangular shape.
>>>
>>> Also, I'm working on figuring out the other ideas for CSS Round Display
>>> which can be applied for various shapes.
>>>
>>> If you have any other thoughts about the spec, please feel free to ask
>>> me :)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jihye
>>>
>>> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Lars Knudsen < [email protected]
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > this is the first I hear of CSS Round Display (been living under a
>>> rock).
>>> >
>>> > One question - if you in the spec state: "Nowadays, devices come in
>>> varied shapes of the displays. It needs to
>>> > consider the shape of the display when implementing web pages on
>>> devices.", why do you then limit the sperc to focus on *one* more (very
>>> specific) shape?
>>> >
>>> > One could imagine that a circle is just a specialization of some
>>> closed bezier curve (or other).
>>> >
>>> > just a thought
>>> >
>>> > br
>>> > Lars
>>> >
>>> >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Jihye Hong <[email protected]
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote:
>>> >> I would like to discuss about integrating polar positioning of CSS
>>> Round Display to Motion Path.
>>> >>
>>> >> I wrote the draft about that:
>>> >>   Spec Draft:
>>> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-round-display/#positioning-content
>>> >> and related thread is here:
>>> >>   Thread:
>>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0077.html
>>> >>
>>> >> The topics for the discussion are:
>>> >> [css-round-display][motion-path] Integrate polar positioning to the
>>> motion path spec
>>> >>   1. Need for 'offset-origin'
>>> >>   2. Initial value of 'offset-rotation'
>>>
>>>
>>
>