Re: [css-fonts] About the breaking change to CSSFontFaceRule interface

On 02/08/2016 10:11, Xidorn Quan wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016, at 05:27 PM, Daniel Glazman wrote:
>> I have only one (rather big) issue with the proposal: it's not very
>> friendly with experimental features/polyfills since there is no extra
>> storage room for user-defined font features... I don't think we should
>> ship any more anything at grammar-level that is not extensible because
>> all properties/features are hardcoded.
> 
> I think objects returned from DOM / CSSOM are not frozen in general, so
> JS code should always be able to attach new attributes to those objects,
> shouldn't it?

In that case, fine by me.

</Daniel>