Re: Test assertions requirement

On 16/08/2016 07:57, Florian Rivoal wrote:
> if others insists we drop it (back?) from must to should, I guess I can begrudgingly agree...

i don't think i would.  I thought i recently read that a decision was 
taken to keep keep assertions, but i can't remember where.  Maybe PLH knows?

the optional in the documentation dates, i think, from the beginning, 
and therefore substantially predates any recent discussions.  I wouldn't 
take it prima facie as evidence that a decision was taken to make 
assertions optional.

ri