Re: Documentation is available
Carlos Puchol <[email protected]> Sun, 18 May 2003 00:00:48 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.cthumb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
fan-tas-tic, terry! the only thing that immediately jumps at me is to remove urgently all references to my personal email :) (i hate getting my email address into spam lists.) also, note that the official cthumb list is sourceforge. i am waiting a while to switch off the one in my server. Terry Gliedt <[email protected]> wrote: > Please find problems and/or make improvements and send them to me (just > save the file, edit it and send it to me). I'll sort out the changes > easily enough. At some point, Carlos, you can snatch the files (or > better, ask me for a TGZ file) and then integrate it into a release of > cthumb. most definitely. could you send the whole batch in a tgz so that i don't miss anything? > Myself, I'd integrate this HTML somewhere into the sourceforge web site > and change the man page to point to it. You can distribute it, but I > think it's probably most useful for someone to just get there via > his/her browser -- but that's your call really. i agree, this is very useful online. but it also should be distributed in the source. > This clearly uses the stuff I know about and use. There are things in > the code I'd never heard of. I keep forgetting how to use cthumb, so > this is as much for me as anyone else :-) I'd appreciate hearing from > people who know about something that is wrong or missing. same here. there are many features, some neat, that i hardly ever use. making albums is still painful. let me diverge a bit here ... i have a _ton_ of pictures to integrate into my albums. i have little time to put even the captions, so they stay album-less in my hard drive. which is a pain because they never make it online for friends and family. i was thinking about why that is the case. there are two reasons: - too many manual steps from camera to album (online or cdrom) - i like to load them with the gimp and save them right back, sometimes i apply some color level enhancement so that they look better. but i really do it for the disk savings. - then i have to generate the album and put the captions. this is a pain. i don't see any way to speed this up via some sort of automation. maybe some super-slick gui to surf the pictures as one types the captions. voice recognition would be the fastest, but still. sorry, a late night rambling. thanks for taking the initiative terry! -c ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore. Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge