Re: CPU usage since 8.7.1
Stefan Eissing via curl-library <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Oct 2025 09:27:35 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.curl.library |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Am 28.10.2025 um 23:15 schrieb Gleb Smirnoff <[email protected]>: > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 11:06:05PM +0100, Daniel Stenberg wrote: > D> > This may actually help our case! > D> > I'm going to give a try to unmodified 8.16.0. > D> > D> It could be worth exploring more exactly what we're talking about. I mean > D> what measurements to do and how to tell what's "good" and what's "bad" in > D> this context. > > The microbenchmark David used is desribed in his email: > > https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg02593.html > > The regression was discovered by a huge A/B test of a system overall, > that involves many machines, many hours and a ton of traffic. What > I'm going to do now is to re-run this A/B test with 8.16.0, to avoid > relying on year old data. Waiting for your results then. The "limit-rate revisisted" PR is https://github.com/curl/curl/pull/18454 I noticed "busy" loops where we expired transfers that are on a speed limits. Hope that addresses the cpu issue for you. As to the accuracy, we'll see what you find in your setup. Cheers, Stefan PS. This would be a good opportunity to sponsor the project. You seem to get quite some mileage out of it. =) > > -- > Gleb Smirnoff -- Unsubscribe: https://lists.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/curl-library Etiquette: https://curl.se/mail/etiquette.html