Update of /cvsroot/curl/curl-www/libcurl
In directory labb.contactor.se:/tmp/cvs-serv9309/libcurl
Modified Files:
_wininet.html
Log Message:
using a quote box
Index: _wininet.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/curl/curl-www/libcurl/_wininet.html,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -d -r1.3 -r1.4
--- _wininet.html 30 Aug 2004 16:57:20 -0000 1.3
+++ _wininet.html 28 Nov 2004 09:30:37 -0000 1.4
@@ -17,10 +17,13 @@
<div class="relatedbox">
<b>Related:</b>
<br><a href="/docs/features.html">libcurl Features</a>
-<br><a href="competitors.html">Compare HTTP Libraries</a>.
-<br><a href="libwww.html">libwww comparison</a>.
+<br><a href="competitors.html">Compare HTTP Libraries</a>
+<br><a href="libwww.html">libwww comparison</a>
</div>
+<p> Opinions brought by David Byron:
+
+<div class="quote">
<ul>
<li> there's a tech note from Microsoft that says not to use WinInet from
@@ -43,7 +46,8 @@
which isn't in the library, but --speed-time and --speed-limit are great.
<li> I've never tried to deal with Microsoft for WinInet support, but the
- curl support (i.e. this list, and Daniel in particular) is _really_ good.
+ curl support (i.e. the libcurl mailing list, and Daniel in particular) is
+ <i>really</i> good.
<li> Even if portability isn't a concern now, it might be later. And,
there's more than just code portability. If you get good with curl, you'll
@@ -51,10 +55,12 @@
WinInet ported anywhere else anytime soon.
</ul>
+</div>
-<p> Facts/opinions brought by David Byron. If you disagree, agree and/or have
- other facts/opinions. Mail us!
+<p>
+ If you disagree, agree and/or have other facts/opinions. Mail us!
#include "_footer.html"
</BODY>
</HTML>
+
_______________________________________________
http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/curl-www-commits
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.