bagder: curl-www/libcurl/hiper _schedule.html,1.10,1.11

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.curl.www.cvs
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Update of /cvsroot/curl/curl-www/libcurl/hiper
In directory labb:/tmp/cvs-serv29821

Modified Files:
	_schedule.html 
Log Message:
spelling is not my biggest skill


Index: _schedule.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/curl/curl-www/libcurl/hiper/_schedule.html,v
retrieving revision 1.10
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -d -r1.10 -r1.11
--- _schedule.html	6 Dec 2005 11:18:28 -0000	1.10
+++ _schedule.html	6 Dec 2005 11:19:04 -0000	1.11
@@ -34,11 +34,11 @@
 
  MARKDATE(Dec 6 2005) Ok, I think I'll change my measuring approach and I will
  instead write up my own HTTP server and control that to allow it to either
- site perfectly quite (just keeping the connection alive) or to send an
- endless stream of data. By allowing the selection of behaviour be based on
- the URL, I should be able to modify my test program to run and test a given
- number of "active" connections with a given number of "existing connections".
- I guess the real-world URLs are too hard to use to make adequate tests with.
+ sit perfectly quiet (just keeping the connection alive) or to send an endless
+ stream of data. By allowing the selection of behaviour be based on the URL, I
+ should be able to modify my test program to run and test a given number of
+ "active" connections with a given number of "existing connections".  I guess
+ the real-world URLs are too hard to use to make adequate tests with.
 <p>
  I found this little benchmark on select() performace compared to other event
  systems:
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.