Re: Close dillo with multiple tabs open
Globe Trotter <itsme_410-/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.dillo.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- On Sat, 9/17/11, Jorge Arellano Cid <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Jorge Arellano Cid <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Dillo-dev] Close dillo with multiple tabs open > To: [email protected] > Date: Saturday, September 17, 2011, 12:09 PM > On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 11:20:29AM > +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 05:04:49AM +0000, corvid > wrote: > > > Roger wrote: > > > > >> > you mean, "confirm to exit > prompt". Ditto. Rarely, if ever accidentally > quit. > > > > >> > > > > >> I wasn't sure what my opinion was > on this at first, but now I think an > > > > >> option sounds reasonable. > > > > > > > > > >Why not, if there is demand for it and > the default is safe > > > > >(i.e. off). > > > > > > > > Ditto. I've never accidentally quit. > > > > > > > > Oh, I've used File > Quit once in a > while, but with that many key sequences or > > > > clicks, it's tough to accidentally > quit. Also, few options under the File > > > > menu. Most times, I just halt -p. > > > > > > Just occurred to me that everyone's been saying > that they don't need this > > > dialog box. I checked firefox and it doesn't warn > when quitting. Maybe we > > > don't need it at all. > > > > Safari has it and given the fact that we only recently > switched from > > Ctrl-Q to Crtl-W for closing tabs, people might > accidentally hit > > Ctrl-Q when they want to close just the tab. It > happend to me at > > least. So for now I would keep it. > > Same for me. > > Now, if somebody wants to add a preference for that, > could be, > but the default should be to ask. I see no harm in this: put in a default but make it configurable. While I don't have the urge to use ctrl-q much, I am still stumped why alt-q does not work now to close dillo, as I had conditioned myself to. i usually immediately rebound and go with the new action....