Re: release candidate for dillo-3.0.1 ready for testing
Axel Beckert <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.dillo.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | DeuxChevaux.org -- The Citr oën 2CV Database |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 03:35:50PM -0400, Benjamin Johnson wrote: >> Four pixels are already quite a lot on todays "HD" screens which just >> have a screen height of 768 pixels. And quite some low-end netbooks >> just have 600 or 480 pixels screen height. There, fource pixels do >> matter. >> >> But OTOH: Why not make it configurable if we disagree? >> >>> It's hardly a dramatic change, yet it dramatically improves the tab >>> appearance and readability: >>> http://dillo-win32.sourceforge.net/dillo/screenshots.php?closeup=Z02-dillo3-homepage.png >> >> Looks perfect and readable for me. > > You say it's wasting space, yet you agree it helps the readability. Ehm, I thought the screenshot was without the added four pixels as you wrote something like making them the same height like the File menu and on that screenshot the tabs still have less height than the File menu. Kind regards, Axel -- /~\ Plain Text Ribbon Campaign | Axel Beckert \ / Say No to HTML in E-Mail and News | [email protected] (Mail) X See http://www.asciiribbon.org/ | [email protected] (Mail+Jabber) / \ I love long mails: http://email.is-not-s.ms/ | http://noone.org/abe/ (Web)