Re: Dillo review article

> On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 08:20:35PM +0000, corvid wrote:
>Roger wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 08:11:52AM -0300, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote:
>> >Hi there,
>> >
>> >  This may be worth adding to our "Dillo in the Press" section:
>> >
>> >    http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/For-Fast-Light-Web-Browsing-Dillos-No-Dallier-73420.html
>> 
>> Just read the first sentence and boy is he wrong!
>
>I've never seen one of these articles without a number of...issues,
>which I suppose is unavoidable when you've just started playing with
>it a little bit.
>
>- He talks about --enable-cookies instead of cookiesrc.
>- It sounds like his distribution has fullwindow_start set, which strikes
>  me as the wrong thing by default.
>- He's using an old version if it uses Ctrl-Q and Alt-Q and doesn't have
>  panel size in the menu.
>- It's surprising to mention style.css instead of dillorc.

I was just joking, but stating how I love that I can actually use a minimal browser
with such a useful site such as Amazon.com's search feature. 

However, on my second post to this thread, I did notice too the style.css
mention was likely mistaken for the dillorc file.  (I do this all the time
myself when learning new features/functions. :-/ )

As to what to put in a default style.css file?  I'm having problems with just
"converting XML to HTML" and "other formats to MOBI (E-Book XML markup)"  As
such, I admit I know just enough to interpret and use css style sheets.  If
the style.css file is for styling fonts (aka theme), I'm terrible at styling
and feel that one terminal font is just fine and dandy as long as I can read
it.

The site requires a user:pass account, so can't immediately post a comment
suggesting the author really meant dillorc.

-- 
Roger
http://rogerx.freeshell.org/