Re: [patch] dlib cleanup

123 <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.dillo.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 05:23:52PM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 12:13:41AM +0400, 123 wrote:
> > malloc.diff: added perror calls for malloc and realloc errors
> > 
> > dstr.diff: dStr* functions cleanup
> > 
> > dlist.diff: replaced recursive QuickSort with qsort from stdlib.h.
> > Tested with file.dpi where it is used for sorting directory listing.
> 
>   There're different criteria to write code. In dlib, a few lines
> are preferred to a single contracted one to make it simpler to
> understand. In the same spirit, scattered return statements are avoided
> to make code path following simpler.

What about perror in malloc? It is still better than silent exit(1).

>   For quick sort I remember having to implement it in dlib because
> stdlib's qsort varies among platforms.

I can only find reports about problems in Solaris qsort related to
performance. There should be no known problems in platforms listed on
http://www.dillo.org/Compatibility.html and qsort is a part of
POSIX/SUS.

qsort is also used in lout/container.cc so broken qsort will break
dillo anyway.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.