Re: fltk linkage

In September 2011, I wrote:
> Do we still have a reason for telling people to stick with
> static linkage when building fltk?

I was thinking about what our installation instructions should look like
these days, and how everyone has a decent chance of having a fltk-1.3
package available and it may not be best to tell them to run off and
compile fltk unless fltk-config --version doesn't tell them any good news
and they can't get a pkg...   and this led me to wonder about the
necessity/appropriateness of static linking.

All that I found in the archive was me wondering about it last year and
no one replying to me. Well, except this now. I'm replying to me, if that
counts.