Re: fltk linkage

On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 06:07:54PM +0000, corvid wrote:
> 
> In September 2011, I wrote:
> > Do we still have a reason for telling people to stick with
> > static linkage when building fltk?
> 
> I was thinking about what our installation instructions should look like
> these days, and how everyone has a decent chance of having a fltk-1.3
> package available and it may not be best to tell them to run off and
> compile fltk unless fltk-config --version doesn't tell them any good news
> and they can't get a pkg...   and this led me to wonder about the
> necessity/appropriateness of static linking.
> 
> All that I found in the archive was me wondering about it last year and
> no one replying to me. Well, except this now. I'm replying to me, if that
> counts.

  FWIW, I build in a Debian system now and:

  $ ldd dillo
  [...]
  libpng12.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpng12.so.0 (0x00007f2c3e312000)
  libfltk.so.1.3 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfltk.so.1.3 (0x00007f2c3dfd0000)
  [...]

  I thought this meant it was linked with a shared version of FLTK.
  What am I missing?

-- 
  Cheers
  Jorge.-