Re: font_factor
"corvid" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.dillo.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20130109182714.GC32231@local> |
Johannes wrote: > On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 11:55:42PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > > I wrote: > > > In styleengine, we use font_factor for calculation of larger and x-small > > > and so forth, but we don't apply it when given an ordinary font size like > > > 11px. > > > > Just to double-check: That's not intended behaviour, right? > > > > sorry for the delay... > This is intentional, but we know that there is a usability issue. > In CSS px, mm, pt etc. define absolute sizes [1]. > So if we want to adhere to the CSS spec strictly I think we can't > just scale them. > On the other hand web designers just use px without thinking about > the implications. Also other browsers allow scaling of those fonts > afaik. > I think we have the following options: > > * ignore CSS and apply font_factor also to absolute font sizes > * implement a zoom feature that displays everything larger (also > images etc. > * check other browsers for more alternatives Applying font_factor seems much more usable to me. A zoom feature would be cool, though. I wonder whether there's some level where we could get cheap and halfway tolerable zooming by throwing some of fltk's matrix transformation stuff at what we're drawing.