Re: font_factor
Johannes Hofmann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.dillo.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 05:24:51PM -0300, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 09:16:08AM +0100, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 11:55:42PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > > > > I wrote: > > > > In styleengine, we use font_factor for calculation of larger and x-small > > > > and so forth, but we don't apply it when given an ordinary font size like > > > > 11px. > > > > > > Just to double-check: That's not intended behaviour, right? > > > > > > > sorry for the delay... > > This is intentional, but we know that there is a usability issue. > > In CSS px, mm, pt etc. define absolute sizes [1]. > > So if we want to adhere to the CSS spec strictly I think we can't > > just scale them. > > On the other hand web designers just use px without thinking about > > the implications. Also other browsers allow scaling of those fonts > > afaik. > > I think we have the following options: > > > > * ignore CSS and apply font_factor also to absolute font sizes > > I'd apply font_factor, especially if that's what other browsers do. > > > * implement a zoom feature that displays everything larger (also > > images etc. > > Scaling images may hurt (think of PDAs). > An image_factor may help for those (just a wild thought). > > > * check other browsers for more alternatives > > Should check before making a decision. My Firefox has a zoom option, that zooms all text and images and an additional option to zoom text only. I also tend to a apply font_factor to all text. Cheers, Johannes