Re: line wrapping

On Sa, Jun 29, 2013, Johannes Hofmann wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 05:08:13PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote:
> > On Do, Jun 27, 2013, Johannes Hofmann wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 07:20:23PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote:
> > > > On Mi, Jun 26, 2013, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 05:17:41PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote:
> > > > > > On Mi, Jun 19, 2013, corvid wrote:
> > > > > > > I noticed that lines aren't wrapping for me with
> > > > > > > http://www.dillo.org/FAQ.html .
> > > > > > > hg bisect says that it started with:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > changeset:   2838:b2b239eb45b9
> > > > > > > summary:     Fixed problem with hyphenation.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Fixed. I didn't fully understand the problem, but the latest change
> > > > > > makes sense and solves the problem.
> > > > > 
> > > > >   After updating to hg tip, the problem persists for me...
> > > > 
> > > > With revision 2861:686f563e96d4? How does it look like? (Perhaps send
> > > > a screenshot, or scp it to dillo.org.)
> > > > 
> > > > How does the attached page look like? What experiences do other users
> > > > make?
> > > 
> > > The only difference I noticed compared to firefox is that dillo
> > > doesn't seem to line-break stuff in the inner boxes (e.g. 
> > > "body {background-color: purple}")
> > > I can't really say whether it should though.
> > 
> > What do you mean with "inner boxes"? BTW, I do not see any difference
> > between Firefox (Iceweasel 10.0.12) and dillo revision 2861.
> > 
> > What about <http://www.dillo.org/FAQ.html>?
> 
> I meant the "inner boxes" on http://www.dillo.org/FAQ.html. E.g the
> one containing "body {background-color: purple}".
> 
> That one doesn't line break for me in dillo, but does so in firefox.
> But I don't know whether this is the thing Jorge was talking about
> in his initial post.

As far as I see, this is because the maximal width of these "inner
boxes" is larger than the minimal width of the "outer box", which is
defined by a wider "pre" section. The differences should depend on
fonts etc.

Anyway, Jorge has confirmed that his problem has been fixed by my
latest change. I hope that also some other glitches (which can be seen
but are hard to define precisely) have gone.

Sebastian