Re: allow_white_bg
"Johannes Hofmann" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.dillo.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <trinity-b52c1d67-5c3f-40d9-acd4-47ef7ef09fde-1376905300106@3capp-gmx-bs31> |
Hi Sebastian, > Gesendet: Montag, 19. August 2013 um 10:32 Uhr > Von: "Sebastian Geerken" <[email protected]> > An: [email protected] > Betreff: [Dillo-dev] allow_white_bg > > Hi! > > It seems that I'm getting old that I tried to set the option > "allow_white_bg" to "false"; to find out that the replacement color is > hardcoded! If I haven't missed something, and noone objets, I'll add a > prefs variable "white_bg_replacement". Sounds good. white_bg_replacement would replace allow_white_bg, right? > > BTW: is there a reason that there is still a prefs variable > "bg_color", while fonts (the actual fonts, not the font classes) are > now defined by CSS? There are some differences in behavior between setting bg_color option and having body {background-color: <something>} in style.css. I'm not sure whether they justify the existence of the bg_color option. But I can't really decide, as I don't use bg_color normally. Cheers, Johannes