Re: socks proxy possible?

Hi

On Sat, 2 Nov 2013 23:37:27 +0100, Johannes Hofmann
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Would it make sense to invest time into native socks support, or is
> it ok to rely on tsocks or similar?

	In my opinion, tsocks works very well, for those that have a socks
proxy, it's normal to rely on it, at least on linux, *bsd and most other
*nix. For windows its another story, i have no knowledge for something
like tsocks for windows but a quick search returns the sockscap as a
similar solution: http://www.socksproxychecker.com/sockscap.html

	So i think its enough to add a reference for this two solutions
in the documentation for those that need socks support.

	Of course, others might have a different opinion :)

higuita
-- 
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the
leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a 
simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or
a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship.
Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of
the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are 
being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and
exposing the country to danger.  It works the same in every country.
           -- Hermann Goering, Nazi and war criminal, 1883-1946

_______________________________________________
Dillo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlJ26jkACgkQrv1jazsMcrMzDgCfUW6qlDeRFB9YX5kzPrtrElnK
w/oAn1z/1v+Z1JjcUrV+Xvbrylkh5z8a
=tC7q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----