Re: Browser tracking
Andreas Kemnade <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.dillo.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, On Mon, 8 Sep 2014 16:15:53 -0300 Jorge Arellano Cid <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > This site is interesting. It gives kind of a score of web browser > trackability. [1] > > @corvid, I thought you'd like to give it a look (AFAIR, you have submitted > some standardizing to our HTTP querying in the past). It looks like > our HTTP_ACCEPT and "User Agent" are the most vulnerable to tracking. > > It looks simple to provide some less unique alternatives in dillorc. > The User Agent string of dillo does not have that many version numbers like the ones of other browsers. I compared the table with iceweasel and chromium. dillo was the least unique browser of them. But there is of course much more to improve. Greetings Andreas Kemnade _______________________________________________ Dillo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dillo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlQOEJ0ACgkQvUy8S31NDeahhQCgtw+zFBkb89g5jK/kWftwyvaK HJAAn3flkwMb8lWgCtcByPzsjQ/phFmm =1P35 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----