Re: what's currently broken in dillo

On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 03:59:15PM +0100, Sebastian Geerken wrote:
> On Fr, Jan 02, 2015, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote:
> >   It's a bit sad to find time and again that 3.0.4 has better rendering
> > than the new branch. (e.g. [1])
> > 
> > [1] http://actualidad.rt.com/economia/161785-china-devastador-dolar-rublo-yuanes
> 
> It is getting better (fixing "plain" bugs). While examining why the
> images are not shown, I noticed that some element is set at height 0.
> Test the attached page in dillo and Firefox and notice the difference:
> Firefox shows the first line, although it has height 0, but draws the
> second line at the same position as the first, the latter shining
> through.
> 
> It is somewhat difficult to imitate this behavour [1]; but two
> solutions are feasable: (i) ignore height (perhaps via user style
> sheet); (ii) use 'height' only to make elements larger (somewhat
> similar to 'adjust_min_width'). In both cases, the two lines would be
> put on top of each other.

  I like (ii). 

  It falls in the "make dillo decide when directives make no sense"
philosophy I'm advocating for..

-- 
  Cheers
  Jorge.-