Documentation in the tarball?
"Sebastian Geerken" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.dillo.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi! Does it make sense to include all developer documentation into the tarball? As an alternative, only user documentation, plus a notice where to find the developer docs, could be included, while the rest can only be found in the repository at hg.dillo.org. I assume that someone who is interested in the internals of dillo will anyway refer to the lastest version from the Hg repository. Keeping it out of the tarball would have advantages: - It makes the tarball smaller. - We developers would not have to think that much about file sizes of the documentation: these files do not go into the tarball; and for those using the lastest version from the Hg repository, it should be reasonable to spend some more disc space. What do you think? Sebastian _______________________________________________ Dillo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dillo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 473 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVYcNNAAoJEAw7+YHB+ZL66R8H/28miDPi7D9GskU6E8IXYWyz 83q/6iHT7MYvl7NkzX4O72ENfFEe3YndNLGng5FHUDo6J/Tj0cx6SdfCXPM3I3b8 1N8R8/E/G5jXuI8hy0O4CPNsI04TwyxK/2+aBkOhjdGkSLblfF3xZISCrPqmGh72 6dc5wCqsBBSxwrBxXagW0Mv2Oaly8PULXxtEmlgrsIXYe5GyWRbqOq7VM92oBXKp 9FrJxols8ouH3OZbuQuagtLg3h7b+TYWK5Q+stud+ElmYtCNVUQ25May+mGp7c1w C3kAjtxTPXaYoqjCGZ0fP9HduOK58NkXM+77VrsoagEDpVAOIBiYbxIqx+ic3JQ= =dplT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----