Re: Fonts not found issue persists in 3.0.5

On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 10:19:11PM +0200, [email protected] wrote:
> See this issue below?
> 
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 09:29:18AM +0200, [email protected] wrote:
> > I got the new Dillo version 3.0.5 (in the master air-gapped box, which I
> > yet have to clone onto this, for online, same hardware box), as it is
> > available in gentoo:
> > 
> > https://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/www-client/dillo/
> > 
> > but my problem with fonts (the FAQ issue
> > http://www.dillo.org/FAQ.html#q27), to which eocene has kindly given the
> > tip for in his message:
> > 
> > http://lists.dillo.org/pipermail/dillo-dev/2015-April/010500.html
> > 
> 
> And we thought:
> > For people reading this message offline, I'll paste his advice, since it is
> > also important:
> > 
> > If you go to dw/fltkplatform.cc and, in FltkFont::initSystemFonts(),
> > remove the leading underscore in
> >    _MSG("Found font: %s%s%s\n", name, t & FL_BOLD ? " bold" : "",
> > to get
> >    MSG("Found font: %s%s%s\n", name, t & FL_BOLD ? " bold" : "",
> > and recompile, what does dillo say when you run it?
> >
> 
> But we were wrong! And it was only something an unimaginative person
> like me can be capable of not figuring out despite urgent need and
> sincere desire because of that urgent need (my eyes have been hurting
> from the fixed not-much-more-than ASCII font that was all I've seen in,
> what?, a few months?
> 
> We were wrong! It only needed that the fltk be recompiled with, guess
> what?, with the the XFT font renederer!
> 
> That was the sole missing thing.

  I'm glad you finally nailed the issue, and have proper fonts.


> But I think I am going to file a bug on Gentoo Bugzilla about this!
> (But if anybody can tell a reason that justifies the xft use flag not
> being the default, pls. do tell me... in which case my filing the bug
> would not make sense; I don't see such reason though.)

  I neither see a reason for this...

-- 
  Cheers
  Jorge.-