Re: [DNG] Will there be a MirDevuan "WTF"?

miro.rovis-w3I/[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.dillo.devel
Message-ID <20150723131946.GC5482@g0n>
---
I sent this message three hours ago, but didn't include the list
address. Sorry!
---

On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:49:34PM -0700, James Powell wrote:

( shouldn't it be like below?, by the netiqette --see KalolaZ just
arrived letter in the Multi-seat thread-- ? )

> > Since you would still like it around, in opportunistic or in some other
> > way that I should call it, I think a question is due.
> > Can you tell to the public what is the purpose of the
> > user-not-asked-about, in fact mostly user-never-even-knowing-about-it
> > encrypted ssh channel that dbus sets up, along with all the
> > non-GNU-compatible remote procedure calls (which are there for what
> > purpose?) that dbus implements?
> > 
> > Is that for FOSS stands for?
> > 
> First off cool your jets, and trying call me out on knowing the
> internals of an IPC in Userspace I didn't develop is very childish.
>
Why not? If you're promoting it, or persuading Devuan into the
acceptance of it?

Anyway, can anyone answer that question?

> I honestly don't care if D-Bus what it does other than be a
> communication and messaging relay between applications and processes,
> as long as it does what it does, and doesn't infringe on anything
> else.
> 
> D-Bus is used and is a requirement for some services and software.
> You're unfortunately not going to have your cake and coffee with
> getting rid of D-Bus.
Well then, keep it for those cases, don't put it in all the Devuan boxen
by default. Will be fine!

> Yes, it's not the greatest design, but it is
> friendly at least to the whole UNIX spectrum.
>
"friendly"... No comment.

> Devuan's main purpose is getting rid of systemd as a hard dependency
> and allowing user choice in init software, not ripping apart every
> project to cater to ever niche and fundamentalist out there preaching
> what they feel is FOSS, and also to not start a witch hunt on software
> projects.
What fundamentalists? The Gentoo folks? Thorsten mirabilos Glaser with
his MirDebian "WTF" project, a fundamentalist? Me, a fundamentalist?

What do you mean? My desire to, after have achived it for me (but only
in Gentoo), some freedom and some security, to teach, if we get a
true-foss Devuan that can get its MirDevuan "WTF" fork for itself, to
teach newbies to build their system hardened-against-intrusion and
surveillance-defeating, that desire of mine a fundamentalist desire?
---
The rest cut out because somewhat made disorderly and illegible by
probably hotmail defaults (that the immediate sender who I'm replying to
apparently uses) or for some other reason.
---
Regards!
-- 
Miroslav Rovis
Zagreb, Croatia
http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr

_______________________________________________
Dillo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.dillo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 819 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=bHMn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.