Re: javascript

src/table.hh might be a reasonable place to start thinking about the
requirements for integrating a new set of tags.

On 26/08/2015, bruce m beach <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> But you haven't added the most important thing: does your site
>>> works under dillo w/duktape?  Because, y'know, that's more than
>>> astounding to me!
>
> Well yes that would be pretty astounding since duk-tape most certainly
> wouldn't do anything since it was just linked in to the dillo
> executable. Dillo has to be modified to use it, maybe a lot of
> work. My guess is that somewhere in Dillo is a state machine that
> parses out keywords or tokens from the incoming stream and when
> it has a complete token it branches to handle the token. When the
> token 'script' is found then the following text is passed to the
> parser in duktape.
>
> Bruce
>
>
> On 8/25/15, Teodoro Santoni <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 08:14:03PM -0700, bruce m beach wrote:
>>> Hello everybody
>>>
>>> I completely happy with dillo just the way it is. I consider it
>>> insane to go on the web with javascript enabled and apart from
>>> gmail I don't normally have cookies enabled. (how can I
>>> differentiate the two users? i.e I have dillo of user 1 on the
>>> the screen and a dillo of user 2 also on the screen but the 2
>>> dillo's are identical in appearance). Anyway all of a sudden
>>> after using dillo for a year or so I find there is a website that
>>> I absolutely must get on but it requires javascript. Well okay I
>>> search the web to try to find something, anything that has
>>> javascript (I've been searching for day and night for about a
>>> week now) and find that there are two things
>>>
>>>  1) Massive huge bloatware
>>>  2) dillo
>>>
>>> Most things don't build, or don't have any kind of a build system
>>> or are for x86 (I'm on arm) so I figure I have to bite the bullet
>>> and build firefox. I've been rolling my own system for about 20
>>> years so so I know whats involved but after two config failures
>>> and it failing on the gigantic final link after an 8 hour build,
>>> I come to the conclusion that lifes not worth it. I don't want
>>> that piece of junk on my computer anyway. Links2 at one time had
>>> javascript but they abandoned it and elinks has javascript as
>>> long as you have seamonkey installed (tarball>190Mbytes)
>>>
>>> Anybody got any ideas?
>>>
>>> I did find one thing. "duktape" (http://duktape.org/)which seems
>>> to be an exceptionlly fine piece of code which is an embeddable
>>> Ecmascript E5/E5.1 engine with a focus on portability and compact
>>> footprint.  All the examples compiled out of the box and linking
>>> it to dillo (duktape.c duktape.h) took a few minutes to change
>>> the makefile.  The size's of the files are
>>>
>>> dillo  558,480
>>> dillo  767,456 with ducttape
>>>
>>> I don't know enough to be able to do anything with it (I work
>>> with hardware) but thought someone might be interested as a route
>>> to get javascript on dillo.
>>
>> Astounding.
>> But you haven't added the most important thing: does your site works
>> under
>> dillo w/duktape?
>> Because, y'know, that's more than astounding to me!
>>
>> --
>> Teodoro Santoni
>>
>> Something is wrong. I don't wanna compile 20 KB of Go code to list files.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dillo-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.dillo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev
>