Re: Dillo-dev Digest, Vol 19, Issue 12

@ Miroslav Rovis:
Thank you, sir. I did not, at first, perceive that your comments were
addressed to me, but assumed they followed up on some topic raised
before I joined the list. But now that I have clicked your links, I
think maybe they were. But I confess that I have not yet been able to
understand. Are you saying I should change something in the source and
recompile Dillo? If so, would you mind saying exactly what file and
how I should change it?

I don't care so much that the fonts be pretty, just legible without
having to touch my nose to the monitor.

On 8/29/15, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> Send Dillo-dev mailing list submissions to
> 	[email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.dillo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	[email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	[email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Dillo-dev digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re:  UI font size (Jorge Arellano Cid)
>    2. Re:  Dillo-dev Digest, Vol 19, Issue 11 - UI font size
>       (Plmalternate Plmalternate)
>    3. Re:  Gentoo live ebuild, WAS: Github..cookies
>       (miro.rovis-w3I/[email protected])
>    4.  Google captcha and cached images at VDR Forum	registration
>       (miro.rovis-w3I/[email protected])
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:10:25 -0300
> From: Jorge Arellano Cid <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Dillo-dev] UI font size
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 01:19:59AM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote:
>>
>> Plmalternate Plmalternate wrote:
>>
>> > If I could figure  out how to change the UI font size  so it was big
>> > enough for me to see, it would be perfect.
>>
>> I  do  this by  setting  "font_factor=1.4"  in  dillorc (it  is  under
>> "RENDERING SECTION").
>
>   There's also "font_min_size". I use this in my dillorc:
>
> # Minimum font size
> font_min_size=18
>
>
> --
>   Cheers
>   Jorge.-
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 21:50:10 -0400
> From: Plmalternate Plmalternate <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Dillo-dev] Dillo-dev Digest, Vol 19, Issue 11 - UI font
> 	size
> Message-ID:
> 	<CAB2o_TGdQ6MMqQPseBWUTvdo6KdxiV2ZieXR1Xv-jMu0N31Ybw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
>> From: Jeremy Henty <onepoint-YprzHiG/[email protected]>
>> Plmalternate Plmalternate wrote:
>>
>>> If I could figure  out how to change the UI font size  so it was big
>>> enough for me to see, it would be perfect.
>>
>> I  do  this by  setting  "font_factor=1.4"  in  dillorc (it  is  under
>> "RENDERING SECTION").
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Jeremy Henty
>
> Thank you, sir. I tried that wth 1.4, 1.5, and 5.0, rebooting each
> time. Makes no difference  I can see on either a 32 bit Ubuntu 14.04
> with plain Openbox or a 64 bit PCLOS with LXDE.
>
> I suspected I should put something in ~/.fltk/fltk.org/fltk.prefs but
> when I searched on that filename the only things I found touching on
> the subject did so simply to say that was wrong.
>
> Just to be clear: I'm talking about the font size of the text
> buttons/menus:
>
> 1st bar:
> "File" & whatever is in the url field like "example.com"
> 2nd bar left:
> "Back", "Forw", "Home", "Reload", "Save", "Stop", "Book", and "Tools".
> 2nd bar right:
> "Images x of y" & "Page z kb"
>
> For some of those there is a corresponding icon, the size of which is
> SLIGHTLY adjustable through Tools, Panel Size, but text size doesn't
> change as far as I can see. I could do without the icons, personally,
> but that's just me.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 04:16:25 +0200
> From: miro.rovis-w3I/[email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Dillo-dev] Gentoo live ebuild, WAS: Github..cookies
> Message-ID: <20150829021625.GA8318@g0n>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 04:16:51PM +0200, miro.rovis-w3I/[email protected]
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 01:04:55PM +0200, [email protected] wrote:
>> > > Dillo ebuild is missing xft flag for fltk, causes eye-sore
>> renamed:
>> www-client/dillo should depend on x11-libs/fltk[xft]
>> > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554588
>> There is more comments, by Walter Dnes, and by me. I saw the mail wasn't
>> reported sent to Walter Dnes, so I thought I'd inform here.
>>
>
> I recently posted a comment on the "www-client/dillo should depend on
> x11-libs/fltk[xft]" WONTFIX but on Gentoo Bugzilla:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554588#c9
>
> Note also the link there to the Forums topic:
> A Tentative at dillo-3.1-dev ebuild
> https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1021878.html#7806130
> where also notice the video:
>
> http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr/foss/cap/cap-150824-Schm-capt/Screen_150824-Gen-Dillo.webm
>
> in which I explain it so even newbies can understand something's likely
> wrong with the treatment of us users of Dillo with the WONTFIX
> attitude, in my opinion.
>
> BTW, also notice the strange kind of pasting with the 3.1-dev Dillo, or
> is it something else? (in the more or less entire bug in question it can
> be seen... No, you can't notice it in the previous comments I posted,
> they cleaned it, only this one last, before they clean it too...).
>
> There is another issue, if I manage to write that separate topic about
> tonight, it's about:
> Why, oh why the Schmoog captcha?
> https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1027382.html
> (but separately if I manage)
>
> I did my best. Regards!
> --
> Miroslav Rovis
> Zagreb, Croatia
> http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 819 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL:
> <http://lists.dillo.org/pipermail/dillo-dev/attachments/20150829/1bb197a7/attachment-0001.sig>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 04:28:28 +0200
> From: miro.rovis-w3I/[email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Dillo-dev] Google captcha and cached images at VDR Forum
> 	registration
> Message-ID: <20150829022828.GB8318@g0n>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I'm a little too tired and really sleepy, but I mention that I hope the
> Dillo developers will be able to tell me more on the issues that I
> thoroughly investigated, and posted a lot of captures and screencasts to
> document it.
>
> Please see, discarding what it unnecessary, the forum topic:
>
> Why, oh why the Schmoog captcha?
> https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1027382.html
> (esp. the post just posted an hour ago or so)
>
> and find it documented at:
> http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr/foss/cap/cap-150824-Schm-capt/
>
> I did my best. Regards! Good night!
> --
> Miroslav Rovis
> Zagreb, Croatia
> http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 819 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL:
> <http://lists.dillo.org/pipermail/dillo-dev/attachments/20150829/b374b825/attachment-0001.sig>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dillo-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.dillo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of Dillo-dev Digest, Vol 19, Issue 12
> *****************************************
>


-- 
I'm on the waiting list for an email account at
protonmail.com
where I'll be philip.mundhenk-g/[email protected]
or maybe philip.mundhenk-g/[email protected]
until the DIME project gets off the ground.

Because the Bill of Rights needs to be more than "a literary fiction".