Re: Font blacklist
"Sebastian Geerken" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.dillo.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Di, Sep 15, 2015, Walter Dnes wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 09:34:20PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote > > On Di, Sep 15, 2015, August Karlstrom wrote: > > > On 2015-09-15 20:55, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > > > >After a dist upgrade to Debian Jessie some rather ugly fonts got > > > >installed, which make reading texts tedious. > > > > > > I run Debian Jessie too and I haven't noticed any ugly fonts. Can you > > > provide an example? > > > > Helvetica, e. g., which looks rather pixelated, as compared to other > > nicely rendered fonts. I'm not sure where this comes from, "apt > > dist-uprade" took several hours. > > > > (BTW, I'm also using libfltk1.3-dev from Debian, without any further > > configuration.) > > Is Debian's libfltk1.3-dev built with the xft option enabled? If not, > then ugly fonts are to be expected. See... > http://www.dillo.org/screenshots/disable_antialiasing.png Not looked at it in detail, but since most fonts render nicely, I assume that the Debian package is indeed build with Xft support. Sebastian _______________________________________________ Dillo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dillo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 473 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJV+LHuAAoJEAw7+YHB+ZL6zGcIAKDNXipmkuaDPwHqXghPksH+ gX12Aew0AwdO8NsABihGmzmDMqo1CV7g/rt1iCBl2bAxIP9MJL/dMpt9jjuW3NMf WdVpKyjfK1l9ywvCROMOtfH84F8PhL9lIG5P8gTRAq47+JQ3DI3gXQCTbsUUpZOe so/NwylhrwR2nHpxih6XMQHdJa50dR5aZMRB0me22lswoSR+LsAYc2PkG781cJmR 9dE3OwMoLR2ZTvynFvUPSa+KpMuDkexyini9/Mc5znXqW7AB2NKQzLHEVk3QeyI0 HSHAzbVcVfinms9MoIk+IknTan9GurfWAX5Jcs2oxPeE3MInZ8xxhekjvDrIlk4= =/Z5w -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----